skip main site navigation
TPF logoTransportation Pooled Fund Program
TPF logoHomeAbout TPF StudiesAuthorized UsersBrowse TPF Studies, selected sectionSearch TPF StudiesSign Up To Be Notified

skip secondary navigation
TPF Sponsors

TPF Studies>>>Detailed View

Study Number:TPF-5(079)
Status:Contract signed
Title:Implementation of the 2002 AASHTO Design Guide for Pavement Structures
Contract/Other Number:
Sponsoring Agency:Kansas Department of Transportation
Lead Agency:Kansas Department of Transportation
Lead Agency Contact:Rodney Montney (rodney@ksdot.org)
Phone: 785-291-3844
Fax: 785-296-2526
Contractor:Kansas State University
Investigator:Stefan Romanoschi (sromano@ksu.edu)
Investigator:Mustaque Hossain (mustak@ksu.edu)
Study Partners:KS, NY
Contract Amount:$609,963
Commitments Received:$462,000
100% SP&R Approval:Approved
Contract Start Date:10/1/2003
Contract End Date:12/31/2009
Objectives:The objective of this research is to develop the calibration procedure for the AASHTO 2002 design guide models for both flexible and rigid pavement structures for this region and to assist the state highway agencies in region in the implementation of the new Guide for pavement design and surface selection practices.
Scope of Work:It is envisioned that this study will be accomplished through the following tasks: 
 
1. Literature Search - A literature search will be conducted to gather detailed information on the AASHTO 2002 design guide models, and all material and performance prediction models that it contains. Special consideration will be given to the models for characterization of pavement materials and soils and the corresponding material testing procedures. At the end of the literature search, based on the findings, a calibration plan will be developed in consultation with the state-selected Project Monitor (s). 
 
2. Pavement Performance and Material Database: At this stage of the project, a database with representative material characterization and pavement condition data for participating states in the region will be built. The process will use data published in various state research reports, construction data as well as condition data available in the pavement management systems. The database will contain information only for several pavement sections considered representative of the roads in the participating states. The sections will be new as well as rehabilitated flexible and rigid pavements.  
 
3. Analytical Model Calibration: In this task, the statistical analysis of the data assembled in the database will be performed. This task will also aim at the calibration factors for the following relationships:  
 
- layer material parameters used in the design model (e.g. stiffness, resilient modulus) and physical material characteristics (e.g. air voids, binder content, cement content). 
- traffic load spectra analysis and current capability of each agency to generate input for the calibration process. 
- pavement performance parameters (e.g. rutting, cracking, joint faulting) and stresses and strains at the corresponding critical locations in the pavement structures under different environmental conditions.  
 
The analysis will also include the study of the reliability of the new AASHTO design method to be applicable for the road conditions in the participating states when proposed calibration factors and material parameters are used. 
 
4. Sensitivity Toward Surface Types Under Consideration- In this task, multiple runs of rigid and flexible pavement design methods will be done to determine the sensitivity of the input variables in the design process.  
 
5. Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis- The proposed LCC analysis module is quite extensive and needs a large number of inputs. In this task, the input needs and availability will be studied in details. The feasibility of developing default parameters for some inputs will also be investigated.  
 
6. Reporting and Training - A final report will be prepared that will give detailed information on methodology and data used for the AASHTO 2002 model calibration. The report will include recommendations on the optimum use of the AASHTO model and life cycle cost analysis methodology as well as recommended default input values for the model parameters. Training of the participating agency pavement design personnel will be conducted to ease their work in understanding and using the model, and to better inform them on the calibration work and the supporting information.  
Comments:Cost per state will be $62,000. The KSDOT has funded this research project at Kansas State University and is offering to serve as lead state in a pooled fund project that would allow surrounding states and other states in the region to share information and resources.
Study Documents:Quarterly Report for the period ending 6/30/10
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 03/31/2010
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Supplemental Agreement No. 4--12/8/2009
 Type: Other
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 12/31/09
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 9/30/09
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 6/30/09
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 3/31/09
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 12/31/08
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Final Report (K-TRAN: KSU-04-4, November 2008) - ***Note: This Final Report Relates to KDOT Work for Project
 Type: Final Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 9/30/08
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 6/30/08
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Supplemental Agreement No. 3--11/15/2006
 Type: Other
 Supplemental Agreement No. 2--02/27/2006
 Type: Other
 Supplemental Agreement No. 1--03/12/2005
 Type: Other
 Lead State Acceptance Letter
 Type: Memorandum
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 3/31/08
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 12/31/07
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 9/30/2007
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 6/30/07
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 03/31/07
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 12/31/06
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 9/30/06
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 6/30/06
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 3/31/06
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 12/31/05
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 9/30/05
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 3/31/05
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 12/31/04
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 9/30/04
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 6/30/04
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Quarterly Report for the period ending 12/31/03
 Type: Quarterly Progress Report
 Work Plan - September 2003
 Type: Work Plan
Subjects:Pavement Design, Management, and Performance
.................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... ....................
.................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... ....................


Copyright statement and legal notices
Please send comments, suggestions, and queries to the Webmaster.