General Information |
|
Solicitation Number: | 1569 |
Status: | Cleared by FHWA |
Date Posted: | Mar 10, 2022 |
Last Updated: | Nov 20, 2023 |
Solicitation Expires: | Mar 10, 2023 |
Partners: | FHWA, FL, GADOT, IL, KY, MN, MO, MS, TN, TX |
Lead Organization: | Minnesota Department of Transportation |
Financial Summary |
|
Commitment Start Year: | 2023 |
Commitment End Year: | 2027 |
100% SP&R Approval: | Approved |
Commitments Required: | $700,000.00 |
Commitments Received: | $1,075,000.00 |
Contact Information |
|
Lead Study Contact(s): | Eyoab Zegeye |
eyoab.zegeye@state.mn.us | |
FHWA Technical Liaison(s): | Patricia Sergeson |
Patricia.sergeson@dot.gov | |
Phone: 202-493-3166 |
Organization | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal Highway Administration | 2023 | $150,000.00 | Stephen Cooper | Stephen Cooper | 443-257-7145 | Stephen.J.Cooper@dot.gov |
Florida Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Charles Holzschuher | Jennifer Clark | 850-414-4614 | jennifer.clark@dot.state.fl.us |
Florida Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Charles Holzschuher | Jennifer Clark | 850-414-4614 | jennifer.clark@dot.state.fl.us |
Florida Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Charles Holzschuher | Jennifer Clark | 850-414-4614 | jennifer.clark@dot.state.fl.us |
Florida Department of Transportation | 2027 | $25,000.00 | Charles Holzschuher | Jennifer Clark | 850-414-4614 | jennifer.clark@dot.state.fl.us |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Ian Rish | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Ian Rish | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Ian Rish | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Ian Rish | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Illinois Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Brian Hill | John Senger | 217-782-8582 | John.Senger@Illinois.gov |
Illinois Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Brian Hill | John Senger | 217-782-8582 | John.Senger@Illinois.gov |
Illinois Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Brian Hill | John Senger | 217-782-8582 | John.Senger@Illinois.gov |
Illinois Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Brian Hill | John Senger | 217-782-8582 | John.Senger@Illinois.gov |
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Brad Frazier | Jarrod Stanley | (502) 782-4090 | jarrod.stanley@ky.gov |
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Brad Frazier | Jarrod Stanley | (502) 782-4090 | jarrod.stanley@ky.gov |
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Brad Frazier | Jarrod Stanley | (502) 782-4090 | jarrod.stanley@ky.gov |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2027 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Mississippi Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Jim Poorbaugh | Robert Vance | RVance@mdot.ms.gov | |
Mississippi Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Jim Poorbaugh | Robert Vance | RVance@mdot.ms.gov | |
Mississippi Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Jim Poorbaugh | Robert Vance | RVance@mdot.ms.gov | |
Mississippi Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Jim Poorbaugh | Robert Vance | RVance@mdot.ms.gov | |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2027 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Xiaoyang Jia | David Lee | David.Lee@tn.gov | |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Xiaoyang Jia | David Lee | David.Lee@tn.gov | |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Xiaoyang Jia | David Lee | David.Lee@tn.gov | |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Xiaoyang Jia | David Lee | David.Lee@tn.gov | |
Texas Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Ruben Carrasco | Ned Mattila | 512-416-4727 | ned.mattila@txdot.gov |
Texas Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Ruben Carrasco | Ned Mattila | 512-416-4727 | ned.mattila@txdot.gov |
Texas Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Ruben Carrasco | Ned Mattila | 512-416-4727 | ned.mattila@txdot.gov |
Texas Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Ruben Carrasco | Ned Mattila | 512-416-4727 | ned.mattila@txdot.gov |
Stripping is a critical
pavement subsurface distress affecting bituminous pavement systems: full-depth
bituminous and composite (especially bituminous over concrete) systems. In
full-depth bituminous pavements, stripping is caused by moisture infiltration
in the pavement system, leading to the loss of bond between the aggregate
particles and the asphalt binder composing the mixture. The bond failure leads
to the formation of an unbonded mixture and ultimately reduces the pavements
bearing capacity. In bituminous overlays, stripping is generally caused by
moisture trapped in the interface above the concrete. Over the years,
substantial progress has been made in developing bituminous mixtures less prone
to stripping, thanks mainly to improved material selection tools, anti-stripping
additives, modified asphalt binders, and improved drainage practices. However,
stripping continues to be a predominant issue because the new stripping
resistant mixtures are placed on top of old bituminous mixtures that are likely
to be affected by stripping.
Stripping leads to the
formation of potholes, cracking, slippage cracking, tearing, and ultimately
reduced strength and serviceability of pavements if not detected and addressed
early. The most challenging aspect of stripping is that it initiates at the
bottom or middle of bituminous layers and propagates upward. Hence, it is
almost impossible to detect and quantify at early stages through visual
inspections or traditional pavement forensic investigation tools. Once the
problem manifests itself on the top surface of the pavement, it is generally
too late for minor localized treatments. The lack of appropriate diagnostic
tools for stripping makes developing proper pavement rehabilitation plans
challenging. For instance, without knowing the stripping's extent, severity,
and depth, it becomes difficult to select an appropriate mill-depth for a new
overlay or a proper rehabilitation strategy (i.e., full reconstruction, mill
and overlay, cold recycling).
Fortunately, new advanced
non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technologies are becoming increasingly
accessible and suitable for solving complex pavement issues. The Strategic
Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) study R06D (Heitzman, et al. 2012) vetted
the capability of several NDE technologies to evaluate pavements affected by
delamination: stripping and debonding. Debonding is a similar type of failure
that occurs when the tacking between the pavement layers (lifts) is inadequate.
However, the affected layers generally remain physically quasi-intact in debonding,
while the layers exhibit full or partial deterioration in stripping. Out of
eight (8) vetted tools, two (2) provide promising results for identifying and
quantifying stripping: the 3D-Ground Penetrating Radar (3D-GPR), an
air-launched antenna array with frequency sweep measurements and the Impact
Echo/Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (IE/SASW) scanning system. Among these
two technologies, 3D-GPR had the added advantage of providing continuous
full-lane width data collected in a single pass at safe traffic traveling
speeds. In particular, the ability of 3D-GPR to scan full-lane width resulted
in higher chances of detecting stripping locations than more traditional
single-channel 1D-GPR systems. While in the case of debonding, 3D-GPR was not
that effective and offered good information only in wet conditions. The IE/SASW
was most effective at identifying discontinuities when the pavement was cold
and stiff. When the R06D was conducted, the IE/SASW testing required lane
closure and did not provide continuous full-lane coverage.
The primary objective of the proposed pooled-fund project is to establish a research consortium focused on addressing the R06D and IAP recommendations. As per the IAP and R06D findings and recommendations, particular emphasis will be placed on using 3D-GPR along with Traffic Speed Deflectometer (TSD) and/or Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) to detect the location, distribution, and severity of stripping in full-depth and composite bituminous pavements. Recognizing that 3D-GPR and TSD may not be readily available to all participating states, the study will allocate a portion of the pool fund to hire consulting firms for 3D-GPR and TSD surveys on the projects considered in this study. This will provide a good opportunity for states to familiarize themselves with 3D-GPR applications. Furthermore, the proposed pool fund study will include 1D-GPR testing on limited projects to compare with the 3D-GPR data. The proposed investigation also recognizes that 3D-GPR alone cannot identify stripping all the time and at all subsurface moisture conditions. Hence, the proposed study will also investigate using IE/SASW, MIRA, Thermal Imaging for localized spot verifications. It is essential to clarify that the intent of this study is not to evaluate these tools but to support and validate the final deliverables of the study. The set goals are to be accomplished by:
The tools (i.e., equipment, testing procedures, data processing algorithms, specifications) advanced through this project will assist state transportation agencies in rapidly and confidently detecting at early stages the location, extent, depth, and severity of stripping in their roads. The tools will also help eliminate or reduce the number of corings required to evaluate road sections suspected of stripping. Specific tasks within this multi-year program will be developed in cooperation with the consortium participants and in such a manner to address the needs of each participant state.
The work plan will
be developed based on the needs and priorities indicated by the consortium
participants during the kick-off meeting. While the details and scope of the
objectives will be further defined to reflect the concerns of the participants,
it is anticipated that the project will include the following:
Survey the experience of the participating states with stripping in bituminous mixtures. The survey will inquire on the types of stripping, severity, location, extent and potential causes observed by the participants. Furthermore, it will gauge the participants' expectations from this project, and the availability of resources or materials (mixtures) utilized to achieve the objective's goals. The findings of this outcome will guide the development of the testing plan for the controlled laboratory and field experiments
Task 2 Signal Pattern Database
Development
Currently, the
use of GPR data to detect stripping activities in bituminous mixtures depends
heavily on operators’ skills and experience. The results are subjective to the
operator’s experience with stripping data. There is a limited guideline for users
to reference on what type of signals indicate potential stripping activities and
severity levels. This task will involve controlled laboratory experiments and
numerical simulations (theoretical modeling) in an attempt to create a database
containing GPR signals that indicate potential stripping in asphalt pavement.
The database will showcase what 1D-GPR or 3D-GPR signals (A-Scan) will look
like in different stripping scenarios.
The task will
build on the lessons learned in Task 2 and will involve integrating
artificially created stripped sections in pavement test sections at the MnROAD test
facility. The consortium will advise how best to create artificially stripped
sections of different dimensions, severity levels, and/or moisture conditions in
the present study. Currently, some of the stripping configurations that are
proposed in this study are:
1. Multiple stripped sections placed at different depths of
an intact bituminous layer
2. Multiple
stripped sections placed at the bottom of bituminous layers (varying
thicknesses): between a bituminous and base aggregate layer and between a
bituminous and concrete layer
Currently,
identifying stripping in the bituminous layers from GPR data is done visually
by examining GPR radargram images. Hence, this process is significantly
dependent on the person's experience interpreting the images, time-consuming
and labor-intensive, which is difficult to be implemented by state agencies as
a routine test method.
In order to
gain highway agencies' interest in using GPR for the detection of stripping it
is important to develop algorithms that enable the automatic detection of
stripped areas in an accurate, effective and efficient way. It is anticipated
that the algorithms will incorporate both 3D-GPR and TSD/FWD measurements. The
developed algorithms will be trained based on the signal database developed on tasks 2 and 3 to identify critical locations and quantify the level and
depth of stripping. This will improve the efficiency of analysis time and
reduce the cost of utilizing the technology.
Several
studies have been carried out by MnDOT and others using different signal
processing methods. However, comprehensive research is needed to develop more
accurate and effective standard algorithms for the automatic identification of
stripping.
Task 4b– Development of algorithms for automatic detection of moisture
In a recently completed, two-years long
proof of concept study, MNDOT evaluated the use of GPR to monitor the seasonal
fluctuation of moisture in the unbound aggregate layers of built pavements. The
study employed a single channel GSSI 350 MHz ground couple antenna operated in
a push mode and three instrumented test sections with different base materials
and design structures (thickness) constructed in MnROAD. This study developed
an algorithm for estimating the moisture content on the base aggregate layers
from the GPR data. The moisture contents and fluctuations obtained from the GPR
data matched those obtained from the in-place sensors. In particular, and most
importantly for the present study, the proof-of-concept study demonstrated that
GPR could be used to discern and identify aggregate base materials and pavement
sections likely to experience high and moisture spikes (due to material
characteristics or poor drainage). These sections are also ideal candidates for
stripping in the bituminous layer. At present, MnDOT is working with 3D-RADAR
to transfer the lesson learned and concept from a single channel antenna to
3D-GPR for continuous full-lane coverage. This tool will provide a companion
tool for predicting sections that are likely to strip based on the moisture
condition in the base layer
Task 5 Implementation Plans and
Evaluation of Actual Roads
The task will apply the developed
algorithms and lessons learned on the previous tasks to evaluate a maximum of 2
road sections suspected of stripping issues from each of the participating
agencies depending on funding availability. Ideally, the evaluation of the
selected road sections will be accomplished using 3D-GPR along with
coring/boring data, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), and Traffic Speed
Deflectometer (TSD). The PFS consortium will work with the participating
agencies to identify how to best analyze data from these technologies and
develop an efficient implementation plan that agencies can use as a starting
place. It is anticipated that 3D-GPR data collections for these roads will be
carried out by participating agencies who own the equipment or by consulting
firms hired by the consortium. TSD data will be contracted out to a consulting
firm based on negotiated fee. Around 25% of the estimated budget is allocated
for TSD and GPR testing. The NDE office of FHWA will assist with IE/SASW, PASP
and MIRA testing.
Task 6 Draft AASHTO/ASTM Specifications
Along with the
standard algorithm for detecting and quantifying stripping, the other important
deliverable of this study will be to develop draft AASHTO specifications for
standard collection and processing of GPR data utilized for stripping
evaluations.
Task 7 Embedding the Algorithm
into Commercial GPR Applications
The development and implementation of an algorithm in Tasks 4 and 5 may be
accomplished in collaboration between the various agencies, consultants and
vendors. The first version of the algorithm may be produced using popular
coding languages such as PYTHON, Matlab or C++. However, once consensus is
reached on the principles and concepts employed to detect stripping, the algorithm
must be transferred into commercially available GPR processing software. This
will standardize the process and enable agencies to use modules embedded in
commercial software instead of not taking advantage of the tool due to a lack
of personnel with coding abilities. If different vendors are identified for
this task, care should be taken that the module incorporated in their
application produces the same outcome.
Task 8 Support and Communication
Provide a platform for
communication, support and sharing information during the PFS and also at the
end to identify next steps and additional research/implementation gaps that
need to be addressed. This task will be essential for collecting and sharing
agency concerns related to stripping and technology improvements and challenges
from vendors. The task will include.
1.
Semi-annual user group seminars
2.
Annual face-to-face user group meetings including invitational travel
3.
Quarterly conference call updates with participating agencies, vendors, and
consultants
4.
Quarterly conference call with the Technical Advisory Committee
5. Website establishment and
maintenance
This task aims at providing
necessary training and technical assistance to participant state agencies, and
it will primarily focus on hardware (i.e., 3D-GPR, FWD, TSD) and data
processing software selected for the project
1.
Hands-on training if needed
2.
Executive level training
3.
Webinar training and on-call assistance
4. Support participant agency
in the development of specifications for data collection and data processing
To successfully accomplish the
objective of the project, vendors should continue to develop their equipment
(hardware and software) with the goal to provide real-time stripping
measurements for the project and network-level pavement. The vendors' efforts to
this end can be supported and incentivized by bringing more transportation
agencies willing to include NDT technologies in their pavement assessment
This project is expected to have
a minimum participation of at least seven agencies. Minimum annual commitment
of $25,000 per year per agency for four years within Fiscal Years 2023-2027.
General Information |
|
Solicitation Number: | 1569 |
Status: | Cleared by FHWA |
Date Posted: | Mar 10, 2022 |
Last Updated: | Nov 20, 2023 |
Solicitation Expires: | Mar 10, 2023 |
Partners: | FHWA, FL, GADOT, IL, KY, MN, MO, MS, TN, TX |
Lead Organization: | Minnesota Department of Transportation |
Financial Summary |
|
Commitment Start Year: | 2023 |
Commitment End Year: | 2027 |
100% SP&R Approval: | Approved |
Commitments Required: | $700,000.00 |
Commitments Received: | $1,075,000.00 |
Contact Information |
|
Lead Study Contact(s): | Eyoab Zegeye |
eyoab.zegeye@state.mn.us | |
FHWA Technical Liaison(s): | Patricia Sergeson |
Patricia.sergeson@dot.gov | |
Phone: 202-493-3166 |
Agency | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal Highway Administration | 2023 | $150,000.00 | Stephen Cooper | Stephen Cooper | 443-257-7145 | Stephen.J.Cooper@dot.gov |
Florida Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Charles Holzschuher | Jennifer Clark | 850-414-4614 | jennifer.clark@dot.state.fl.us |
Florida Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Charles Holzschuher | Jennifer Clark | 850-414-4614 | jennifer.clark@dot.state.fl.us |
Florida Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Charles Holzschuher | Jennifer Clark | 850-414-4614 | jennifer.clark@dot.state.fl.us |
Florida Department of Transportation | 2027 | $25,000.00 | Charles Holzschuher | Jennifer Clark | 850-414-4614 | jennifer.clark@dot.state.fl.us |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Ian Rish | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Ian Rish | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Ian Rish | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Ian Rish | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Illinois Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Brian Hill | John Senger | 217-782-8582 | John.Senger@Illinois.gov |
Illinois Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Brian Hill | John Senger | 217-782-8582 | John.Senger@Illinois.gov |
Illinois Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Brian Hill | John Senger | 217-782-8582 | John.Senger@Illinois.gov |
Illinois Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Brian Hill | John Senger | 217-782-8582 | John.Senger@Illinois.gov |
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Brad Frazier | Jarrod Stanley | (502) 782-4090 | jarrod.stanley@ky.gov |
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Brad Frazier | Jarrod Stanley | (502) 782-4090 | jarrod.stanley@ky.gov |
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Brad Frazier | Jarrod Stanley | (502) 782-4090 | jarrod.stanley@ky.gov |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 2027 | $25,000.00 | Eyoab Zegeye | Leif Halverson | Leif.Halverson@state.mn.us | |
Mississippi Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Jim Poorbaugh | Robert Vance | RVance@mdot.ms.gov | |
Mississippi Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Jim Poorbaugh | Robert Vance | RVance@mdot.ms.gov | |
Mississippi Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Jim Poorbaugh | Robert Vance | RVance@mdot.ms.gov | |
Mississippi Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Jim Poorbaugh | Robert Vance | RVance@mdot.ms.gov | |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2027 | $25,000.00 | Jonathan Varner | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Xiaoyang Jia | David Lee | David.Lee@tn.gov | |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Xiaoyang Jia | David Lee | David.Lee@tn.gov | |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Xiaoyang Jia | David Lee | David.Lee@tn.gov | |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Xiaoyang Jia | David Lee | David.Lee@tn.gov | |
Texas Department of Transportation | 2023 | $25,000.00 | Ruben Carrasco | Ned Mattila | 512-416-4727 | ned.mattila@txdot.gov |
Texas Department of Transportation | 2024 | $25,000.00 | Ruben Carrasco | Ned Mattila | 512-416-4727 | ned.mattila@txdot.gov |
Texas Department of Transportation | 2025 | $25,000.00 | Ruben Carrasco | Ned Mattila | 512-416-4727 | ned.mattila@txdot.gov |
Texas Department of Transportation | 2026 | $25,000.00 | Ruben Carrasco | Ned Mattila | 512-416-4727 | ned.mattila@txdot.gov |
Stripping is a critical
pavement subsurface distress affecting bituminous pavement systems: full-depth
bituminous and composite (especially bituminous over concrete) systems. In
full-depth bituminous pavements, stripping is caused by moisture infiltration
in the pavement system, leading to the loss of bond between the aggregate
particles and the asphalt binder composing the mixture. The bond failure leads
to the formation of an unbonded mixture and ultimately reduces the pavements
bearing capacity. In bituminous overlays, stripping is generally caused by
moisture trapped in the interface above the concrete. Over the years,
substantial progress has been made in developing bituminous mixtures less prone
to stripping, thanks mainly to improved material selection tools, anti-stripping
additives, modified asphalt binders, and improved drainage practices. However,
stripping continues to be a predominant issue because the new stripping
resistant mixtures are placed on top of old bituminous mixtures that are likely
to be affected by stripping.
Stripping leads to the
formation of potholes, cracking, slippage cracking, tearing, and ultimately
reduced strength and serviceability of pavements if not detected and addressed
early. The most challenging aspect of stripping is that it initiates at the
bottom or middle of bituminous layers and propagates upward. Hence, it is
almost impossible to detect and quantify at early stages through visual
inspections or traditional pavement forensic investigation tools. Once the
problem manifests itself on the top surface of the pavement, it is generally
too late for minor localized treatments. The lack of appropriate diagnostic
tools for stripping makes developing proper pavement rehabilitation plans
challenging. For instance, without knowing the stripping's extent, severity,
and depth, it becomes difficult to select an appropriate mill-depth for a new
overlay or a proper rehabilitation strategy (i.e., full reconstruction, mill
and overlay, cold recycling).
Fortunately, new advanced
non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technologies are becoming increasingly
accessible and suitable for solving complex pavement issues. The Strategic
Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) study R06D (Heitzman, et al. 2012) vetted
the capability of several NDE technologies to evaluate pavements affected by
delamination: stripping and debonding. Debonding is a similar type of failure
that occurs when the tacking between the pavement layers (lifts) is inadequate.
However, the affected layers generally remain physically quasi-intact in debonding,
while the layers exhibit full or partial deterioration in stripping. Out of
eight (8) vetted tools, two (2) provide promising results for identifying and
quantifying stripping: the 3D-Ground Penetrating Radar (3D-GPR), an
air-launched antenna array with frequency sweep measurements and the Impact
Echo/Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (IE/SASW) scanning system. Among these
two technologies, 3D-GPR had the added advantage of providing continuous
full-lane width data collected in a single pass at safe traffic traveling
speeds. In particular, the ability of 3D-GPR to scan full-lane width resulted
in higher chances of detecting stripping locations than more traditional
single-channel 1D-GPR systems. While in the case of debonding, 3D-GPR was not
that effective and offered good information only in wet conditions. The IE/SASW
was most effective at identifying discontinuities when the pavement was cold
and stiff. When the R06D was conducted, the IE/SASW testing required lane
closure and did not provide continuous full-lane coverage.
The primary objective of the proposed pooled-fund project is to establish a research consortium focused on addressing the R06D and IAP recommendations. As per the IAP and R06D findings and recommendations, particular emphasis will be placed on using 3D-GPR along with Traffic Speed Deflectometer (TSD) and/or Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) to detect the location, distribution, and severity of stripping in full-depth and composite bituminous pavements. Recognizing that 3D-GPR and TSD may not be readily available to all participating states, the study will allocate a portion of the pool fund to hire consulting firms for 3D-GPR and TSD surveys on the projects considered in this study. This will provide a good opportunity for states to familiarize themselves with 3D-GPR applications. Furthermore, the proposed pool fund study will include 1D-GPR testing on limited projects to compare with the 3D-GPR data. The proposed investigation also recognizes that 3D-GPR alone cannot identify stripping all the time and at all subsurface moisture conditions. Hence, the proposed study will also investigate using IE/SASW, MIRA, Thermal Imaging for localized spot verifications. It is essential to clarify that the intent of this study is not to evaluate these tools but to support and validate the final deliverables of the study. The set goals are to be accomplished by:
The tools (i.e., equipment, testing procedures, data processing algorithms, specifications) advanced through this project will assist state transportation agencies in rapidly and confidently detecting at early stages the location, extent, depth, and severity of stripping in their roads. The tools will also help eliminate or reduce the number of corings required to evaluate road sections suspected of stripping. Specific tasks within this multi-year program will be developed in cooperation with the consortium participants and in such a manner to address the needs of each participant state.
The work plan will
be developed based on the needs and priorities indicated by the consortium
participants during the kick-off meeting. While the details and scope of the
objectives will be further defined to reflect the concerns of the participants,
it is anticipated that the project will include the following:
Survey the experience of the participating states with stripping in bituminous mixtures. The survey will inquire on the types of stripping, severity, location, extent and potential causes observed by the participants. Furthermore, it will gauge the participants' expectations from this project, and the availability of resources or materials (mixtures) utilized to achieve the objective's goals. The findings of this outcome will guide the development of the testing plan for the controlled laboratory and field experiments
Task 2 Signal Pattern Database
Development
Currently, the
use of GPR data to detect stripping activities in bituminous mixtures depends
heavily on operators’ skills and experience. The results are subjective to the
operator’s experience with stripping data. There is a limited guideline for users
to reference on what type of signals indicate potential stripping activities and
severity levels. This task will involve controlled laboratory experiments and
numerical simulations (theoretical modeling) in an attempt to create a database
containing GPR signals that indicate potential stripping in asphalt pavement.
The database will showcase what 1D-GPR or 3D-GPR signals (A-Scan) will look
like in different stripping scenarios.
The task will
build on the lessons learned in Task 2 and will involve integrating
artificially created stripped sections in pavement test sections at the MnROAD test
facility. The consortium will advise how best to create artificially stripped
sections of different dimensions, severity levels, and/or moisture conditions in
the present study. Currently, some of the stripping configurations that are
proposed in this study are:
1. Multiple stripped sections placed at different depths of
an intact bituminous layer
2. Multiple
stripped sections placed at the bottom of bituminous layers (varying
thicknesses): between a bituminous and base aggregate layer and between a
bituminous and concrete layer
Currently,
identifying stripping in the bituminous layers from GPR data is done visually
by examining GPR radargram images. Hence, this process is significantly
dependent on the person's experience interpreting the images, time-consuming
and labor-intensive, which is difficult to be implemented by state agencies as
a routine test method.
In order to
gain highway agencies' interest in using GPR for the detection of stripping it
is important to develop algorithms that enable the automatic detection of
stripped areas in an accurate, effective and efficient way. It is anticipated
that the algorithms will incorporate both 3D-GPR and TSD/FWD measurements. The
developed algorithms will be trained based on the signal database developed on tasks 2 and 3 to identify critical locations and quantify the level and
depth of stripping. This will improve the efficiency of analysis time and
reduce the cost of utilizing the technology.
Several
studies have been carried out by MnDOT and others using different signal
processing methods. However, comprehensive research is needed to develop more
accurate and effective standard algorithms for the automatic identification of
stripping.
Task 4b– Development of algorithms for automatic detection of moisture
In a recently completed, two-years long
proof of concept study, MNDOT evaluated the use of GPR to monitor the seasonal
fluctuation of moisture in the unbound aggregate layers of built pavements. The
study employed a single channel GSSI 350 MHz ground couple antenna operated in
a push mode and three instrumented test sections with different base materials
and design structures (thickness) constructed in MnROAD. This study developed
an algorithm for estimating the moisture content on the base aggregate layers
from the GPR data. The moisture contents and fluctuations obtained from the GPR
data matched those obtained from the in-place sensors. In particular, and most
importantly for the present study, the proof-of-concept study demonstrated that
GPR could be used to discern and identify aggregate base materials and pavement
sections likely to experience high and moisture spikes (due to material
characteristics or poor drainage). These sections are also ideal candidates for
stripping in the bituminous layer. At present, MnDOT is working with 3D-RADAR
to transfer the lesson learned and concept from a single channel antenna to
3D-GPR for continuous full-lane coverage. This tool will provide a companion
tool for predicting sections that are likely to strip based on the moisture
condition in the base layer
Task 5 Implementation Plans and
Evaluation of Actual Roads
The task will apply the developed
algorithms and lessons learned on the previous tasks to evaluate a maximum of 2
road sections suspected of stripping issues from each of the participating
agencies depending on funding availability. Ideally, the evaluation of the
selected road sections will be accomplished using 3D-GPR along with
coring/boring data, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), and Traffic Speed
Deflectometer (TSD). The PFS consortium will work with the participating
agencies to identify how to best analyze data from these technologies and
develop an efficient implementation plan that agencies can use as a starting
place. It is anticipated that 3D-GPR data collections for these roads will be
carried out by participating agencies who own the equipment or by consulting
firms hired by the consortium. TSD data will be contracted out to a consulting
firm based on negotiated fee. Around 25% of the estimated budget is allocated
for TSD and GPR testing. The NDE office of FHWA will assist with IE/SASW, PASP
and MIRA testing.
Task 6 Draft AASHTO/ASTM Specifications
Along with the
standard algorithm for detecting and quantifying stripping, the other important
deliverable of this study will be to develop draft AASHTO specifications for
standard collection and processing of GPR data utilized for stripping
evaluations.
Task 7 Embedding the Algorithm
into Commercial GPR Applications
The development and implementation of an algorithm in Tasks 4 and 5 may be
accomplished in collaboration between the various agencies, consultants and
vendors. The first version of the algorithm may be produced using popular
coding languages such as PYTHON, Matlab or C++. However, once consensus is
reached on the principles and concepts employed to detect stripping, the algorithm
must be transferred into commercially available GPR processing software. This
will standardize the process and enable agencies to use modules embedded in
commercial software instead of not taking advantage of the tool due to a lack
of personnel with coding abilities. If different vendors are identified for
this task, care should be taken that the module incorporated in their
application produces the same outcome.
Task 8 Support and Communication
Provide a platform for
communication, support and sharing information during the PFS and also at the
end to identify next steps and additional research/implementation gaps that
need to be addressed. This task will be essential for collecting and sharing
agency concerns related to stripping and technology improvements and challenges
from vendors. The task will include.
1.
Semi-annual user group seminars
2.
Annual face-to-face user group meetings including invitational travel
3.
Quarterly conference call updates with participating agencies, vendors, and
consultants
4.
Quarterly conference call with the Technical Advisory Committee
5. Website establishment and
maintenance
This task aims at providing
necessary training and technical assistance to participant state agencies, and
it will primarily focus on hardware (i.e., 3D-GPR, FWD, TSD) and data
processing software selected for the project
1.
Hands-on training if needed
2.
Executive level training
3.
Webinar training and on-call assistance
4. Support participant agency
in the development of specifications for data collection and data processing
To successfully accomplish the
objective of the project, vendors should continue to develop their equipment
(hardware and software) with the goal to provide real-time stripping
measurements for the project and network-level pavement. The vendors' efforts to
this end can be supported and incentivized by bringing more transportation
agencies willing to include NDT technologies in their pavement assessment
This project is expected to have
a minimum participation of at least seven agencies. Minimum annual commitment
of $25,000 per year per agency for four years within Fiscal Years 2023-2027.
Title | Type | Private |
---|---|---|
Approval of SPR Waiver | Memorandum | N |
Bituminous Pavement Stripping Pooled Fund Study Proposal | Work Plan | N |